US Lecce
12º#12 with 9 points (3W · 0D · 4L). Averages 1.17 goals for and 2 goals against per match.
- W @ Udinese Calcio 3-0
- L Bologna FC 1909 1-2
- L @ AC Milan 0-3
- W AC Monza 3-2
- L @ Cagliari Calcio 0-1
To get the alert, turn on notifications.
Notifications are blocked in this browser. Allow them in the site settings to get the preview.
To get the alert, turn on notifications.
Notifications are blocked in this browser. Allow them in the site settings to get the preview.
We'll notify you of the goals, red cards and the final score.
Log in to turn it onUS Lecce hosts Juventus FC carrying a negative goal difference and a run of matches without a win against this opponent spanning eight encounters. While Juventus FC arrives holding the seventh position with a positive goal difference, both teams share identical away and home win counts in the tournament after three matches each on their respective sides. The historical imbalance meets a US Lecce side struggling to convert in half of its league fixtures, testing a Juventus FC defense that has kept clean sheets in half of its matches so far.
Updated on Sunday, October 18, 2026 at
US Lecce have not beaten Juventus FC in 8 games.
67% of Juventus FC's goals come in the last fifteen minutes.
US Lecce failed to score in 3 of their 7 games in the competition.
33% of US Lecce's goals come in the first fifteen minutes.
#12 with 9 points (3W · 0D · 4L). Averages 1.17 goals for and 2 goals against per match.
#8 with 11 points (3W · 2D · 2L). Averages 1.33 goals for and 1.33 goals against per match.
US Lecce struggles to maintain consistency at home with a single victory from three matches, while Juventus FC mirrors that exact away win count on the road. This identical output on opposite sides of the pitch forces the visitors to translate their superior overall possession into better finishing against a defensive block that concedes twice as many goals as it scores.
| Team | MP | GD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Internazionale Milano | 7 | +12 | 19 |
| 2 | SS Lazio | 7 | +10 | 19 |
| 3 | AS Roma | 7 | +13 | 17 |
| 4 | AC Milan | 7 | +7 | 15 |
| 5 | Como 1907 | 7 | +5 | 14 |
| 6 | Frosinone Calcio | 7 | +4 | 13 |
| 7 | Cagliari Calcio | 7 | -1 | 13 |
| 8 | Juventus FC | 7 | +1 | 11 |
| 9 | SSC Napoli | 7 | +3 | 10 |
| 10 | Torino FC | 7 | +1 | 10 |
| 11 | Atalanta BC | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 12 | US Lecce | 7 | -3 | 9 |
| 13 | US Sassuolo Calcio | 7 | -2 | 8 |
| 14 | AC Monza | 7 | -2 | 7 |
| 15 | Bologna FC 1909 | 7 | -4 | 5 |
| 16 | Udinese Calcio | 7 | -7 | 4 |
| 17 | Genoa CFC | 7 | -8 | 4 |
| 18 | ACF Fiorentina | 7 | -9 | 4 |
| 19 | Parma Calcio 1913 | 7 | -9 | 4 |
| 20 | Venezia FC | 7 | -10 | 3 |
US Lecce. With Tiago Gabriel accounting for a significant share of the home scoring output while the team routinely struggles to produce in half of its fixtures, the hosts rely heavily on his conversions to bridge a clear offensive gap. If that output dries up against a solid defensive unit, the alternative options provide considerably less margin for error.
Juventus FC. While the visitors rely on contributions from defenders like Gleison Bremer to share the scoring load, the hosts depend on a tighter group where attacking productivity concentrates heavily on players like Tiago Gabriel. That narrower distribution forces US Lecce to find alternative sources when defensive pressure shuts down its primary options.
Average of the most recent matches with stats available (7 and 7 respectively).
Combining the visitor dominance in total shots with the local defensive vulnerabilities suggests a match where US Lecce absorbs pressure while attempting to limit scoring opportunities. Juventus FC will likely control the tempo through sustained territorial pressure, though the low scoring trend in their recent fixtures indicates a tightly contested battle rather than an open exchange.
The concentration of US Lecce scoring in the opening fifteen minutes intersects directly with Juventus FC accumulating the vast majority of its goals during the final quarter of an hour, dividing the match outcome between early home aggression and late visiting persistence.
Analyzing the historical trajectory alongside current scoring metrics indicates that the visiting side consistently converts territorial control into narrow margins against this opponent, a pattern reinforced by recent low-scoring outcomes in this fixture.
37 1 · in 10 meetings
Analyzing the distribution of previous scorers reveals that visiting threats extend beyond central forwards to include defensive contributions from players like Gleison Bremer, while US Lecce depends heavily on sparse individual conversions against opponents who average nearly four dozen bookings across a decade of encounters without maintaining discipline issues.